Universal Service Fund Tax on VoIP Providers remains a top priority by FCC
1 Star it
Share
Ankit , New Delhi:
Dec 15 2005
Made Popular Dec 15 2005
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
Universal Service Fund Tax on VoIP Providers remains a top priority by FCC - VOIP Blog
Dec 15 2005
[... I think I pay enough taxes as it is, there is no reason why anyone should have to pay a tax for VoIP communications over an internet connection that you most likely already have to pay taxes for. Since when was double taxation okay?
Universal Service ...]
Comment Link
The Universal Service Fund as presented by Congress, the FCC and the communications companies is illegal.
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows congress to impose an involuntary contribution (this is an oxymoron). The USF is nothing more than a sham developed by Congress, the communications companies and the FCC. It is not a tax and cannot be legally collected because it does not fit the conditions of taxation as described in the constitution. Ergo it is called a contribution and fraudulently refereed to as a charge of some sort.
I submit that Congress cannot legally mandate contributions to an independent not-for-profit company and neither can the FCC. Also telecommunications companies cannot contribute to a fund and pass that on to the consumer as a cost or a service imposed by the FCC. Therefore, it should be discontinued immediately.”
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows congress to impose an involuntary contribution (this is an oxymoron). The USF is nothing more than a sham developed by Congress, the communications companies and the FCC. It is not a tax and cannot be legally collected because it does not fit the conditions of taxation as described in the constitution. Ergo it is called a contribution and fraudulently refereed to as a charge of some sort.
I submit that Congress cannot legally mandate contributions to an independent not-for-profit company and neither can the FCC. Also telecommunications companies cannot contribute to a fund and pass that on to the consumer as a cost or a service imposed by the FCC. Therefore, it should be discontinued immediately.”
Local Opinions (2)
0 Stars
Universal Service Fund Tax on VoIP Providers remains a top priority by FCC - VOIP Blog
Dec 15 2005
,
[... I think I pay enough taxes as it is, there is no reason why anyone should have to pay a tax for VoIP communications over an internet connection that you most likely already have to pay taxes for. Since when was double taxation okay?
Universal Service ...]
0 Stars
The Universal Service Fund as presented by Congress, the FCC and the communications companies is illegal.
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows congress to impose an involuntary contribution (this is an oxymoron). The USF is nothing more than a sham developed by Congress, the communications companies and the FCC. It is not a tax and cannot be legally collected because it does not fit the conditions of taxation as described in the constitution. Ergo it is called a contribution and fraudulently refereed to as a charge of some sort.
I submit that Congress cannot legally mandate contributions to an independent not-for-profit company and neither can the FCC. Also telecommunications companies cannot contribute to a fund and pass that on to the consumer as a cost or a service imposed by the FCC. Therefore, it should be discontinued immediately.”
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows congress to impose an involuntary contribution (this is an oxymoron). The USF is nothing more than a sham developed by Congress, the communications companies and the FCC. It is not a tax and cannot be legally collected because it does not fit the conditions of taxation as described in the constitution. Ergo it is called a contribution and fraudulently refereed to as a charge of some sort.
I submit that Congress cannot legally mandate contributions to an independent not-for-profit company and neither can the FCC. Also telecommunications companies cannot contribute to a fund and pass that on to the consumer as a cost or a service imposed by the FCC. Therefore, it should be discontinued immediately.”
Global Opinions (2)
0 Stars
Universal Service Fund Tax on VoIP Providers remains a top priority by FCC - VOIP Blog
Dec 15 2005
,
[... I think I pay enough taxes as it is, there is no reason why anyone should have to pay a tax for VoIP communications over an internet connection that you most likely already have to pay taxes for. Since when was double taxation okay?
Universal Service ...]
0 Stars
The Universal Service Fund as presented by Congress, the FCC and the communications companies is illegal.
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows congress to impose an involuntary contribution (this is an oxymoron). The USF is nothing more than a sham developed by Congress, the communications companies and the FCC. It is not a tax and cannot be legally collected because it does not fit the conditions of taxation as described in the constitution. Ergo it is called a contribution and fraudulently refereed to as a charge of some sort.
I submit that Congress cannot legally mandate contributions to an independent not-for-profit company and neither can the FCC. Also telecommunications companies cannot contribute to a fund and pass that on to the consumer as a cost or a service imposed by the FCC. Therefore, it should be discontinued immediately.”
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows congress to impose an involuntary contribution (this is an oxymoron). The USF is nothing more than a sham developed by Congress, the communications companies and the FCC. It is not a tax and cannot be legally collected because it does not fit the conditions of taxation as described in the constitution. Ergo it is called a contribution and fraudulently refereed to as a charge of some sort.
I submit that Congress cannot legally mandate contributions to an independent not-for-profit company and neither can the FCC. Also telecommunications companies cannot contribute to a fund and pass that on to the consumer as a cost or a service imposed by the FCC. Therefore, it should be discontinued immediately.”
Add your Comment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 



